the tone of the page contains more emotionality on logging (and apparent emphasis) than is necessary. Link to logging issues would be more appropriate.
P3 wording 'implement'(under main) is odd/incorrect. P2 under 'history' -no reference to the 'illegal' commentary. P3 under 'history' contains similar charged wording. >'infamous' 'feverish' 'almost complete destruction' etc. Never like to see "arguably" in a wiki page. Vote to keep page due to history and use but the History sections needs a serious rewrite.
Xxam.mmm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxam.mmm (talk • contribs) 18:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
In addition to the less than neutral tone already mentioned, much of this article pertains more to the Hume-Bennett Lumber Company and Draft:Hume Lake Christian Camps than it does the lake itself. I suggest moving these sections to their appropriate pages and replacing some portions with more neutral content already in place on those pages. – Jon Adams (talk) 03:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
|WikiProject Lakes||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject California||(Rated Start-class)|
On 26 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Hume lake for a record of the discussion.